.
While
Blackpool might as well be pay one price, Drayton Manor has already gone
POP.
Reportedly,
once the park made this valiant move, visitor numbers dropped
considerably, although it’s worth noting it was a quiet year for the
park; G Force has since opened and won back many visitors.
Drayton
Manor have resisted the urge to refine their entry policy of choice for
quite some time. While many of Drayton Manors’ initiatives seem to
follow Alton Towers as reliably as man’s best friend, even parks like
Oakwood have offered pay-one-price entry for a considerable amount of
time.
|
Changing
Drayton to ticketed entrance could have cause shockwaves |
|
Along
with the new ticketed entry, Drayton Manor’s entire entrance area was
rebuilt with a row of ticket booths and a Tussauds-style covered
turnstile plaza.
We
asked Colin Bryan a while ago why they dared gamble on a pay one-price
structure when the park had been operating the wristband scheme for so
long.
“The
new pay one price system has reduced theft dramatically, which was
becoming an increasing problem.
“The
old system was easy to cheat. Even though there are still teenagers who
climb over fences, at least they can be ejected from the park now if
they don’t have a valid ticket”
While
people going against the spirit of wristbands sounded their death knell
at Drayton, Brighton Pier had the opposite problem when they moved
towards giving visitors the option to pay one price.
During
a trial in early 2005 problems arose with people taking liberties on
rides like the Dodgems where there is no discernable loading area
meaning that a antisocial minority were riding over and over again and
causing trouble when being asked to let other riders on.
In
this form, the wristbands have never returned to Brighton Pier, and it
does perhaps show just how many variables there are that should be taken
into account when considering a change to the way rides are paid for.
|
Introducing
wristbands on Brighton pier unearthed a few problems |
|
Perhaps
it is no coincidence that it has historically been the larger parks that
have offered pay one price entry; while it’s unlikely that Brighton
Pier would ever move towards paid entry, at least in our lifetimes, a
wristband would have had a place on many a peoples’ wrists – rides
like the Dodgems, the cramped layout of the pier and the limited
capacity of rides like Booster mean that perhaps there’s no place for
wristbands in some parks.
While
you can’t put a price on the convenience of a wristband or
pay-one-price entry, there are a few reasons why parks choose to go this
route.
Firstly,
in the case of Blackpool, they can accurately see trends within the park
per visitor. Every visitor has a bar-coded wristband and has it scanned
as they go through the turnstile of each ride.
Consequently,
the park can accurately report on what rides are popular and at what
time as well as getting a broad snapshot of visitors’ tastes – for
example, if they ride the Big One whether they’re likely to be
interested in Valhalla.
Information
like this is priceless when it comes to running a theme park.
Another
reason is the prestige that is associated with paying one price.
Historically, large American-style theme parks have been pay-on-price,
while pay-per-ride encompasses anything ranging from Pleasure Beach
Blackpool to a grotty run-down seaside resort.
In
fact, many fairs have used a pay-one-price entry system to help the case
that they are not fairs, but in fact are ‘travelling theme parks’.
|
Funderworld
uses a pay-one-price system which embellishes the claim that it's
a travelling theme park |
|
We’ve
seen this before for Elliot Hall’s Winter Wonderland, Wilson’s Euro
Fun Park and Funderworld. All three of these events market(ed)
themselves as ‘travelling theme parks’, and capitalise on many of
the facets that make a theme park a theme park, including what is the
biggest departure for fairs; paid entry.
While
paid entry makes the event more marketable, another reason is,
apparently, security – having paid entry and a perimeter fence means
that it is often more trouble that it’s worth for the more unsavoury
clientele. Continues...
|